Ron Paul is a Kook

Well, that is the label Ron Paul's been awarded by the good people who oppose him and his ideas.

But what is a "kook". According to the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, a kook is:

"One whose ideas or actions are eccentric, fantastic, or insane"

OK. So from this definition I assume that the "sane" people are implying that Ron Paul and his ideas are "insane".

But, before I allow myself to be sucked into this belief like a sheep, I first need to validate if Ron Paul's ideas are "kooky". Then I will decide.

To do this, I will juxtapose Ron Paul's ideas (the kooky ones) against the dissenter's ideas (like day and night, hot and cold, etc.)

The Kooky Ideas vs. The Sane Ideas

Freedom vs Slavery

Peace vs War

Capitalism vs Socialism (communism)

Sound Money vs Fiat Money

Savings vs Cheap Credit/Debt

Non-Intervention vs Intervention

Free Economy vs Planned Economy

Surplus vs Deficit

Anti Income Tax vs Pro Income Tax

Independence vs Dependence

Solvency vs Bankruptcy

Deflation vs Inflation

Conservative vs Liberal

Deregulation vs Regulation

Proactive vs Reactive

Decentralized Government vs Centralized Government

Limited Government vs Big Government

Individualism vs Collectivism

Pro-Market vs Pro-Government

Private Property vs No Private Property

Money backed by Gold vs Money backed by Debt

Wow, interesting when you compare the ideas like this, huh?

Ron Paul is a kook...yeah, right! He is actually fantastic!

The Devilish Mixture of Stagflation

By Bill Bonner

"One part slump…one part inflation…and one part who-knows-what. Of course, the feds are eager to put more inflation into the brew. If they had their druthers, the concoction would have more of a kick - with more exciting price increases and less depressing slump."

Read the rest

Upping the Inflation Dosage

By Peter Schiff

In perhaps one of biggest ironies to ever to come out of Washington, this week Congress simultaneously pilloried major league baseball players for using artificial stimulants to pump up their performance while passing legislation to do just that to the national economy. Am I the only one laughing?

In reality, the current slump in the U.S. economy is simply the come down from years of financial doping in the form of skyrocketing home values and easy credit. Rather than reaching for yet another syringe, Congress should ask Americans to do what it demands of ballplayers: play within their natural means. Unfortunately in the case of the economy, the patient is already so juiced up that further doses may not only fail to stimulate but may result in a trip to the emergency room.

As the widely praised “economic stimulus” bill was signed into law, the only dissent heard was from those saying the plan did not go far enough. Speaking for those unheard voices who disagree with the strategy entirely, I believe the most significant aspect of the plan is that it creates a new and improved method for delivering inflation.

Previously, the government has largely relied on interest rate stimulus to keep the economy humming. In this method, money supply growth, also known as inflation, is channeled through the banking system. The Fed makes cheap credit available to banks, which then lend out the new funds or use them to acquire higher yielding assets. As a result, asset prices, such as stocks, bonds and real estate, have been bid up to bubble levels. However, the inflationary impact on consumer prices occurs with a considerable lag.

Now that rate cuts alone are proving insufficient, mainly because banks are now so over-loaded with questionable collateral and shaky loans that few can consider acquiring more assets or extending additional credit (no matter how cheap such activities can be funded), the Government is opting for a more direct approach. By printing money and mailing it directly to the citizenry, the “stimulus plan” cuts out all of the financial middle men and administers the inflation drug directly to consumers.

If simply printing money could solve financial problems, the Fed could send $10 million to every citizen and we could all retire en masse to Barbados. However, more money chasing a given supply of goods simply pushes up prices and does nothing to improve underlying economics. Since this new money will go directly into consumer spending, without first being filtered thought asset markets, the effects on consumer prices will be far more immediate.

This politically inspired placebo will do nothing to cure what ails our economy. The additional consumer spending will merely exacerbate our imbalances, allow the underlying problems to worsen, and put additional upward pressure on both consumer prices and eventually long-term interest rates as well. The failure of the stimulus plan to cure the economy will cause the Government, and the Wall Street brain trust, to conclude that it was simply too small. Their next solution will be to administer an even stronger dose.

My prediction is that over the course of the next few years, successive doses of even larger stimulus packages will fail to revive the economy. As the recession worsens and the dollar drops through the floor and consumer prices and long–term interest rates shoot thought the roof, politicians and economists will look for scapegoats. Few, if any, will properly attribute the problems to the toxic effects of the stimulus itself.

However, like all drugs, the biggest danger is an overdose. In monetary terms an overdose is hyperinflation, which will surely kill our economy. It is my sincere hope that before we reach that “point of no return,” a correct diagnosis is finally made. When that occurs, the stimulants will be cut off, and the free market will finally be allowed to administer the only cure that works: recession. If that means we lose some speed on our fastball, so be it. Maybe we could use a few months in the minor leagues to get back to basics. While we may not like the economic side effects of stopping cold turkey, it sure beats carrying our money around in wheelbarrows!

For a more in depth analysis of the tenuous position of the Americana economy and U.S. dollar denominated investments, read my new book “Crash Proof: How to Profit from the Coming Economic Collapse.”

******

Mr. Schiff began his investment career as a financial consultant with Shearson Lehman Brothers, after having earned a degree in finance and accounting from U.C. Berkeley in 1987. A financial professional for over twenty years he joined Euro Pacific in 1996 and has served as its President since January 2000. An expert on money, economic theory, and international investing, Peter is a highly recommended broker by many leading financial newsletters and investment advisory services. He is also a contributing commentator for Newsweek International and served as an economic advisor to the 2008 Ron Paul presidential campaign.

******

FMM Comment:

The scapegoat referred to WILL be capitalism. Ron Paul addressed the question, "Has Capitalism Failed?" long ago in the U.S. House of Representatives, July 9, 2002.

"Corruption and fraud in the accounting practices of many companies are comingto light. There are those who would have us believe this is an integral part of free-market capitalism. If we did have free-market capitalism, there would be no guarantees that some fraud wouldn't occur. When it did, it would then be dealt with by local law-enforcement authority and not by the politicians in Congress, who had their chance to "prevent" such problems but chose instead to politicize the issue, while using the opportunity to promote more Keynesian useless regulations.

Capitalism should not be condemned, since we haven't had capitalism. A system of capitalism presumes sound money, not fiat money manipulated by a central bank. Capitalism cherishes voluntary contracts and interest rates that are determined by savings, not credit creation by a central bank. It's not capitalism when the system is plagued with incomprehensible rules regarding mergers, acquisitions, and stock sales, along with wage controls, price controls, protectionism, corporate subsidies, international management of trade, complex and punishing corporate taxes, privileged government contracts to the military–industrial complex, and a foreign policy controlled by corporate interests and overseas investments. Add to this centralized federal mismanagement of farming, education, medicine, insurance, banking and welfare. This is not capitalism!

To condemn free-market capitalism because of anything going on today makes no sense. There is no evidence that capitalism exists today. We are deeply involved in an interventionist-planned economy that allows major benefits to accrue to the politically connected of both political spectrums. One may condemn the fraud and the current system, but it must be called by its proper names – Keynesian inflationism, interventionism, and corporatism.

What is not discussed is that the current crop of bankruptcies reveals that the blatant distortions and lies emanating from years of speculative orgy were predictable. "

Capitalism rests its case.

Let's Legalize Competing Currencies

By Ron Paul

Before the US House of Representatives, February 13, 2008

I rise to speak on the concept of competing currencies. Currency, or money, is what allows civilization to flourish. In the absence of money, barter is the name of the game; if the farmer needs shoes, he must trade his eggs and milk to the cobbler and hope that the cobbler needs eggs and milk. Money makes the transaction process far easier. Rather than having to search for someone with reciprocal wants, the farmer can exchange his milk and eggs for an agreed-upon medium of exchange with which he can then purchase shoes.

This medium of exchange should satisfy certain properties: it should be durable, that is to say, it does not wear out easily; it should be portable, that is, easily carried; it should be divisible into units usable for everyday transactions; it should be recognizable and uniform, so that one unit of money has the same properties as every other unit; it should be scarce, in the economic sense, so that the extant supply does not satisfy the wants of everyone demanding it; it should be stable, so that the value of its purchasing power does not fluctuate wildly; and it should be reproducible, so that enough units of money can be created to satisfy the needs of exchange.

Over millennia of human history, gold and silver have been the two metals that have most often satisfied these conditions, survived the market process, and gained the trust of billions of people. Gold and silver are difficult to counterfeit, a property which ensures they will always be accepted in commerce. It is precisely for this reason that gold and silver are anathema to governments. A supply of gold and silver that is limited in supply by nature cannot be inflated, and thus serves as a check on the growth of government. Without the ability to inflate the currency, governments find themselves constrained in their actions, unable to carry on wars of aggression or to appease their overtaxed citizens with bread and circuses.

Read the rest

The Frightful Face of Stimulus

Among businesspeople, bankers, and investors, there is a growing fear that the economy is headed towards recession or already in one. But that alone is not the source of worry. After all, an economy if left alone to function in freedom can recover. The real problem has to do with the political response. There is every indication that no matter who comes to be in charge in November, we face a future of massive spending, inflating, and regulating.

And here is the real danger. One only needs to look at such preposterous measures as the "stimulus package" that congress passed to much fanfare. Dumping money into consumers' hands, drawn from wherever they can get it, is the only means these guys can dream up to shore up prosperity. That only proves that they don't know what brings about prosperity in the first place, which is not congress but free enterprise.

Economist Robert Higgs compares a "stimulus package" to getting water out of the deep end of the swimming pool and dumping in the shallow end – all with the expectation that the water level will rise. As he emphasizes, economists should never tire of asking where the money for stimulus is going to come from. Mankind has yet to invent a machine to create it out of nothing: it's either taxing, inflating, or going into debt that has to be paid later (and crowds out capital creation now). There is no other way.

Read the rest

Whore of the World

No institution in modern times is as vile, insidious, corrupt, evil and disgusting as a Central Bank.

It is a whore that has stradled the globe, copulating and spreading its version of syphilis, namely inflation, in an orgy of debt and cheap credit.

The biggest whore of them all, is the Federal Reserve.

Reuter reports that a Depression risk might force U.S. to buy assets. Really? How will this work?

"Fear that a hobbled banking sector may set off another Great Depression could force the U.S. government and Federal Reserve to take the unprecedented step of buying a broad range of assets, including stocks, according to one of the most bearish market analysts."

What is so bad about the Fed and U.S. govenment buying a broad range of assets, including stock? Effectively, if the Fed buys an asset, it means that the asset is monetized, or turned into cash for the seller. The money paid by the Fed doesn't exist.

During a normal transaction, a buyer and seller exchanges money for goods. The money used actually exists. It comes from the existing money supply (assuming the transaction doesn't involve credit).

The money offered by The Fed and/or government to conclude the transaction is money added to the current money supply, also known as inflation.

That extreme scenario, which would aim to stave off deflation and stabilize the economy, is evolving as the base case for Bernard Connolly, global strategist at Banque AIG in London.

In the late 1980s and early 1990's Connolly worked for the European Commission analyzing the European monetary system in the run up to the introduction of the euro currency.

"Avoiding a depression is, unfortunately, going to have to involve either a large, quasi-permanent increase in the budget deficit -- preferably tax cuts -- or restoring overvaluation of equity prices," Connolly said on Monday.

"If conventional monetary policy is not enough to produce that result, the government may have to buy equities, financed by the Fed," Connolly said.

What is so bad about deflation. It corrects the wrong created by inflation. It washes out the excesses and brings the market back to equalibrium.

"While Connolly already sees some parallels with the 1930s, he expects that a more pro-active central bank and government will probably help avert a repeat of that scenario today.

The build up of a credit bubble in recent years was similar to the late 1920s run-up to the Great Depression, he said."

Wrong. The perception that a more "pro-active Central Bank and Government" will avert a repeatof is flawed.

Continued interferance by The Fed and government only postpones and further inflates the inevitable correction.

The Reuters article is based on a worst case scenario and might not even materialise. However, if you catch a wiff of The Fed resorting to these type of tactics, be prepared for a monetary meltdown.

How to Socialise Risk

What does it mean when a government "socializes" something? The answer is quite simplistic.

When a government socialiszes something, it means that it is incurring a cost to do something, and that cost is transferred to the taxpayer. Northern Rock in the U.K. is an excellent example and illustrates The Economic Incompetence of Socialism.

The Wall Street Journal reports on the attempts by banks to get government to "socialize" some of the risk THEY took on:

"The banking industry, struggling to contain the fallout from the mortgage debacle, is urgently shopping proposals to Congress and the Bush administration that could shift some of the risk for troubled loans to the federal government."

Nice business to be in, this banking business. If going to school was anything like banking, nobody would fail, no matter how dumb you are.

The Fed's Open Checkbook Policy

By Bill Bonner

"Faced with what appeared to be a '70s style slump, Bernanke rushed off in the opposite direction - offering lower interest rates and more cash. He hopes to avoid a recession and - who knows - this morning's news suggests that he may have done the trick."

Read the rest

For Interest Sake !

Chuck Jaffer at Marketwatch reckons that Certificates of deposit don't have much horsepower for today's savers. He is right. Chuck goes on to say the following:

Investing with the expectation of losing money is stupid. Locking your money into an investment that can't keep pace with inflation is the same thing. With the cost of living on the rise and interest rates on the decline, that makes bank certificates of deposit that are more than a 1.5 percentage points behind inflation a dumb idea.

For certificates of deposit, savers who locked their money in before the Fed's recent cuts, are much more likely to be ahead of inflation, and clearly should ride out the length of their term deposit. For investors with new CDs, penalties for early withdrawal could make a pull-out even more costly than simply lagging the rate of inflation.

Before I go any further, I think it is appropriate to first establish what inflation is. The popular belief these days is that inflation is the "Rise in Prices". But, something has to cause prices to rise. In his book "What You Should Know About Inflation", Henry Hazlitt sums up Inflation as follows:

No subject is so much discussed today—or so little understood—as inflation. The politicians in Washington talk of it as if it were some horrible visitation from without, over which they had no control—like a flood, a foreign invasion,or a plague. It is something they are always promising to "fight"—if Congress or the people will only give them the "weapons" or "a strong law" to do the job.

Yet the plain truth is that our political leaders have brought on inflation by their own money and fiscal policies. They are promising to fight with their right hand the conditions brought on with their left.

Inflation, always and everywhere, is primarily caused by an increase in the supply of money and credit. In fact, inflation is the increase in the supply of money and credit.

If you turn to the American College Dictionary, for example, you will find the first definition of inflation given as follows:

"Undue expansion or increase of the currency of a country, esp. by the issuing of paper money not redeemable in specie."

In recent years, however, the term has come to be used in a radically different sense. This is recognized in the second definition given by the American College Dictionary:

"A substantial rise of prices caused by an undue expansion in paper money or bank credit."

Now obviously a rise of prices caused by an expansion of the money supply is not the same thing as the expansion of the money supply itself. A cause or condition is clearly not identical with one of its consequences. The use of the word "inflation" with these two quite different meanings leads to endless confusion.

The word "inflation" originally applied solely to the quantity of money. It meant that the volume of money was inflated, blown up, overextended. It is not mere pedantry to insist that the word should be used only in its original meaning. To use it to mean "a rise in prices" is to deflect attention away from the real cause of inflation and the real cure for it.

Let us see what happens under inflation, and why it happens.

When the supply of money is increased, people have more money to offer for goods. If the supply of goods does not increase—or does not increase as much as the supply of money—then the prices of goods will go up. Each individual dollar becomes less valuable because there are more dollars.

Therefore more of them will be offered against, say, a pair of shoes or a hundred bushels of wheat than before. A "price" is an exchange ratio between a dollar and a unit of goods. When people have more dollars, they value each dollar less. Goods then rise in price, not because goods are scarcer than before, but because dollars are more abundant.

In the old days, governments inflated by clipping and debasing the coinage. Then they found they could inflate cheaper and faster simply by grinding out paper money on a printing press. This is what happened with the French assignats in 1789, and with our own currency during the Revolutionary War. Today the method is a little more indirect.

Our government sells its bonds or other IOU's to the banks. In payment, the banks create "deposits" on their books against which the government can draw. A bank in turn may sell its government IOU's to the Federal Reserve Bank, which pays for them either by creating a deposit credit or having more Federal Reserve notes printed and paying them out. This is how money is manufactured.

The greater part of the "money supply" of this country is represented not by hand-to-hand currency but by bank deposits which are drawn against by checks. Hence when most economists measure our money supply they add demand deposits (and now frequently, also, time deposits) to currency outside of banks to get the total.

The total of money and credit so measured was $63.3 billion at the end of December 1939, and $308.8 billion at the end of December 1963. This increase of 388 per cent in the supply of money is overwhelmingly the reason why wholesale prices rose 138 per cent in the same period.

This is the issue Ron Paul refers to in his speaches. If you didn't understand what he was talking about, you should understand now. This phenomenon is not exclusive to the U.S.A. Any country with a Central Bank will be exposed to this type of monetary inflation.

Furthermore, credit created by banks is another underestimated contributor to inflation. People believe that the money they borrow from a bank is the money of another depositor. That is only 10% true. The fact is that banks are ALLOWED to create money out of thin air. For every $1 deposited with a bank, they can create another $9 to lend to other people. This "legally fraudulant" practice is better known as "fractional reserve banking". It is also the reason why banks are tinkering on the brink of collapse. If you want more information, read The Economic Incompetence of Socialism.


Getting back to ol' Chuck's article, he continues to say that:

Clearly, certificates of deposit are not money losers. No matter how low the payout, they are better than stuffing money in a mattress, and they provide a safe haven -- with coverage from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. -- for investors who are skittish about the market.

But anyone turning away from market risk could be giving a big wet kiss to purchasing-power risk -- the chance that their money grows more slowly than the rate of inflation -- and there is little doubt that the majority of people investing in CDs now fall into that category. For proof, look no further than the numbers.

I have a problem with this statement. If you deduct the 2007 CPI value of 4.1% from whatever yield you are receiving now on your CD, you have a problem. Your answer is hovering close to zero. Your problem becomes even bigger if you believe CPI to be 4.1% as the government claims it to be. Shadow Stats estimates annual M3 (broad money supply growth) at around the 15% level. That is why you can't figure how CPI can be at 4.1% when you see the price of goods around you rising at a higher rate. I say CDs are money losers.

I also believe The Fed is well aware of this. Dropping rates will eventually discourage people to save. The Fed wants you out there spending, stimulating the economy with those worthless Dollars. It is not interested in you parking your savings in some CD account.

Still don't understand the consequence of inflation? Henry Hazlitt further says:

Inflation, to sum up, is the increase in the volume of money and bank credit in relation to the volume of goods. It is harmful because:

• It depreciates the value of the monetary unit,
• Raises everybody's cost of living,
• Imposes what is in effect a tax on the poorest (without exemptions) at as high a rate as the tax on the richest,
• Wipes out the value of past savings,
• Discourages future savings,
• Redistributes wealth and income wantonly,
• Encourages and rewards speculation and gambling at the expense of thrift and work,
• Undermines confidence in the justice of a free enterprise system,
• Corrupts public and private morals and
• Encourages malinvestment by entrepreneurs.

I don't know. Chuck leaves me with the impression that he is marketing CDs on behalf of the banks in order to help them build up reserves. :-)

My personal investment/savings strategy: Meet or beat the annual growth of M3

IMF Gold Sales Don't Change Anything

Boris Sobolev writes the following:

"Many pundits have been calling for gold to correct since October. But the rally in gold has been strong, steady and without any sizable corrections. Much money is still sitting on the sidelines, waiting for a cheaper entry point. It is quite possible that this entry point is coming soon as the G7 has just agreed to allow the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to start selling a portion of its 3,200 tonne gold holdings to cover its running deficits. The details of the sale will not be known until April, but the most mentioned figure for the total tonnes up for sale is 400 or about one eighth of total IMF holdings.

It is difficult to guess gold’s reaction to the news, but it is clear that the metal’s fundamentals remain sound. Paper money is in oversupply, gold is in demand by investors and especially countries looking to diversify away from the US dollar. Undoubtedly, buyers for extra gold offered by the IMF will be easily found. IMF sales don’t change anything."

Read the full article

How to Stimulate Yourself - Part 2

The Stimulus' Short-Term Purpose
Christopher Westley

The Wall Street Journal's Mark Gongloff quotes Lehman economist Ethan Harris in this morning's "Ahead of the Tape" column:

In the rush to enact a timely package, politicians may have stopped a 2008 recession, but they have ignored a risky letdown -- after the election. [The U.S. faces ] another brush with recession in 2009" [for this reason].

Gongloff adds that once the "stimulus cocktail wears off,"

...home prices seem likely to keep falling, weighing on consumer balance sheets, confidence and spending. The expansion after the the 2001 recession ... was partly fueled by more than $1 trillion in borrowing against home equity. It is hard to see the economy getting that lift this time.

Even if the stimulus package serves to help the political class survive the November elections, it remains that (as Hazlitt pointed out) the longer and indirect consequences of policies or actions are those that the good economists will focus on. Unfortunately, democratic capitalism produces politicians and the economists who focus purely on short-term results.

Until the rank-and-file realize that it is the expanding nation-state itself, with its monetary inflation and government spending, that has created this mess, and that more of the same can only prolong the inevitable (and make it worse), then the next few years will look like the 1970s all over again. This time, could we at least be spared the disco?

FMM Comment: My recommendations still stands on How to Stimulate Yourself

Dow Jones Musical Chairs

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- With Altria Group Inc. and Honeywell International Inc. booted out, the Dow Jones Industrial Average is now getting a little less industrial and a little more oriented financial and oil, with Bank of America Corp. and Chevron Corp. joining the world-famous blue-chip index.

Read the rest

FMM Comment: Nadeem Walayat made the following point in his article:

"Don't Bet Against the Dow!".

"Investors should realise one important factor about the Dow 30 stock market index and other similar general multi-sector indices that are made up of a limited number of stocks. The Indices are designed to exhibit the long-term inflationary growth spirals. In that in the long-run the indices will always move to a new high! "

Beware the smoke and mirrors!

Words from the (Investment) Wise

by Prieur du Plessis


The past week witnessed a turnaround in sentiment as renewed recession fears dominated investors' actions. Stock markets across the globe were subjected to selling pressure, while credit spreads scaled new highs. "What the market giveth [the previous week], it also taketh away [last week]," was Briefing.com's very apt description of events.

A particularly weak ISM Services report and the specter of bond insurer downgrades further reignited recession concerns, and reminded pundits of the words of Lily Tomlin, the American comedian: "Things are going to get a lot worse before they are going to get worse."

Randall Forsythe of Barron's offered the following commentary: "The Mardi Gras that's lasted four decades for the American consumer is drawing to an end, if it is not already over. After Fat Tuesday comes Ash Wednesday, which is observed today, and is the beginning of Lent, a 40-day period of fasting, self-examination and renewal for Christians, analogous to Ramadan for Muslims or Yom Kippur for Jews. Lower interest rates are a palliative, not a cure, for the economy's woes. Time is the only healer. Economists call that time a recession, and it can no longer be avoided."

Before highlighting some thought-provoking news items and quotes from market commentators, let's briefly review the financial markets' movements on the basis of economic statistics and a performance chart.

Read the rest

The Mother of All Bubbles

By Peter Schiff

In contrast to the dismal forecasting record of mainstream economists over the last few years, the forecasts that I have made regarding the dollar, oil, commodities, precious metals, global stock markets, inflation, and the U.S. economy have all come to pass. In addition, unlike the top economic oracles on Wall Street and in Washington, I can also point to similar accuracy in predicting the bursting of growing bubbles, first with technology in the late 1990’s, and more recently with real estate. However, my long-standing prediction about the fate of the bond market has fared much worse. I still do believe this prediction was not wrong, but simply premature.

For years I have predicted that the falling dollar, persistent trade deficit, and the lack of domestic savings would combine to send long-term interest rates sharply higher. The effects of these fundamental drivers would undermine the Fed’s efforts to lower short-term rates and compound the problems for the housing market and the U.S. economy. Yet as of today, the yield on the thirty-year Treasury bond still stands below 4.5%, within 40 basis points of a generational low. Either this is the one piece of the puzzle that I somehow got wrong, or other factors are working to temporarily confound fundamental economics and prop up the bond market. As you might imagine, I am confident that it is the latter and consider the U.S. Treasury market to be the mother of all bubbles.

I have often said that the only thing worse than holding U.S. dollars is holding promises to be paid U.S. dollars at some distant point in the future. However, this is precisely what U.S. Treasuries represent. Given all of the inflation that already exists, and all of the additional inflation likely to be created over that time period, why would anyone pay par value for the right to receive $1,000 in thirty years in exchange for a mere 4.5% coupon? Although it looks like the sucker bet of the century, the fools have been lining up to buy. Alan Greeenspan called this a "conundrum." I simply call it mass delusion of the same variety that brought us pets.com, and $800,000 tract homes in the middle of the California desert.

Just like dot coms or real estate, today’s bond prices reflect a fantasy world. In this "Bizarro" reality, the dollar will remain strong, inflation will stay low, economic strength will persist uninterrupted, and Fed policy will be predominantly hawkish for the foreseeable future. But when the fog finally lifts, and investors come to grips with a sagging dollar, recession, gaping budget and current account deficits, and the most accommodative Fed imaginable, bond prices will collapse, sending long-term interest rates skyrocketing higher. Unfortunately, for investors who hitched their wagons to benign government CPI statistics and ignored real world evidence of inflation [rapid money supply growth, surging gold, oil and other commodity prices (wheat and soy beans prices catapulted to record highs this week), the sinking dollar, and actual increases in consumer prices,] the losses will be excruciatingly real.

It is important to remember that for every borrower there has to be a lender. For example, if a homeowner wants to refinance his mortgage, there must be someone willing to loan him the money. Practically everyone on Wall Street is hailing the Fed’s recent rate cuts because they believe it will allow strapped ARM holders to refinance into more affordable mortgages. However, while low rates are great for borrowers, they are lousy for lenders. Why would anyone want to offer a thirty-year mortgage at an artificially depressed interest rate? As soon as the Fed raises rates again, as it clearly intends to do once the crisis ends, all that low yielding mortgage paper will collapse in value. Lenders can surely figure this out and will therefore refuse to volunteer to be the patsy in this plan.

Eventually, the world’s lenders will reach similar conclusions with respect to U.S. Treasuries. No matter how low the Fed funds or discount rates get, private savers around the world will simply refuse to lend given the inherent risks and paltry returns. At some point the sheer absurdity of holding long-term, low-yielding receipts for future payments of depreciating U.S. dollars will be apparent to all. After all, it was not too long ago that investors thought holding subprime mortgages from financially strapped borrowers who could not possibly repay them was also a great idea -- so great in fact that many leveraged themselves to the hilt to buy them. Judging from the extremely poor demand at this week’s $9 billion auction of thirty-year Treasury bonds, the day of reckoning may not be too far off.

For now there are a host of factors temporarily propping up the Treasury bond market, such as unrealistically sanguine inflation expectations, foreign central bank and hedge fund buying, short covering, credit spreads, problems in the mortgage market, recession fears, and flight to what is falsely perceived to represent the ultimately in safety and quality. When these props give way, look out below! As we have learned from previous bubbles they can inflate for a long time before they burst. As this one has been inflating longer then most it has amassed quite a bit of air. When it ultimately finds its pin the popping sound will be deafening.

For a more in depth analysis of the tenuous position of the Americana economy and U.S. dollar denominated investments, read my new book “Crash Proof: How to Profit from the Coming Economic Collapse.”

******

Mr. Schiff began his investment career as a financial consultant with Shearson Lehman Brothers, after having earned a degree in finance and accounting from U.C. Berkeley in 1987. A financial professional for over twenty years he joined Euro Pacific in 1996 and has served as its President since January 2000. An expert on money, economic theory, and international investing, Peter is a highly recommended broker by many leading financial newsletters and investment advisory services. He is also a contributing commentator for Newsweek International and served as an economic advisor to the 2008 Ron Paul presidential campaign.

>> Click here for Mr. Schiff's video interviews.

Passing the Buck back to the Future

The BIG Kahunas are getting plans in place to postpone the inevitable market collapse to an unknown future date. It will be interesting to see what plans these fools come up with. It's either "Inflation or Death!"

******

TOKYO (Reuters) - Financial leaders from the world's richest nations stood ready to discuss a global policy response to the credit crisis, which has unleashed economic downdrafts and market turbulence that knows no borders.

Aggressive action by the United States to cut interest rates and taxes to ward off recession has tested the limits of cooperation in the Group of Seven.

A question of how far other major economies should follow has provided a tense backdrop for finance ministers and central bankers as they gather in Tokyo to seek ways to repair damage to their economies and financial markets wrought by the U.S. subprime mortgage crisis.

But officials arriving on Friday for G7 meetings this weekend showed a readiness to begin tackling problems together.

Read the rest

Credit Crisis: Precursor of Great Inflation

The so-called "credit crisis" is gaining momentum. Investors increasingly question the solidity of the banking system, as evidenced by banks' tumbling stock prices and rising funding costs. With bank credit supply expected to tighten, the profit outlook for the corporate sector, which has benefited greatly from "easy credit" conditions, deteriorates, pushing firms' market valuations lower. In fact, peoples' optimism has given way to fears of job losses and recession on a global scale.

The obsession with a policy of lowering the interest rate is rooted in a deep-seated ideological aversion against the interest rate. It is a destructive ideology, in particular if the government is in charge of the money supply. Because then the government central bank will lower the interest rate to whatever is deemed appropriate from the viewpoint of the government, pressure groups, and vested interest. FULL ARTICLE

FX Insights Trade Team Update 06/02/2008

By FX Insights Moderator

Another boring day in the market with little volatility to speak of. We do, however, have some important things to cover in today's update... a few different topics we need to talk about...

I'd first like to talk about the signal that was triggered this morning and why we had to "cancel" it... very early this morning we triggered a buy signal and decided to make our first buy level at 4600. The signal triggered exactly at the price of 4608. Based on the time of day and based on market conditions, we felt as if the market would come down to at least the 4600 level and determined this to be a good place to take our first entry.

The market, unfortunetly had some other ideas and decided not to come down, but to take off from the exact point where we triggered the signal. When the market reached 4635, we decided to "cancel" the signal because our first buy level was never reached. This is only the second time in the history of our signal that we had to cancel it for this reason.

Why do we cancel a signal if the market takes off before our first buy level is touched? It's all in the name of risk managment... you see, we knew the market would go up at least 20 pips from the place where the signal was triggered, however, we also knew that if it first went up only to come back down, it may continue down and or stay down today. So, in managing risk, we simply let the market do its thing... the market did go up to 4672 today, so even if you bought in at the trigger price of 4608 when you got your SMS, you still would have made some great profits even though we had to cancel out the signal.

I just wanted to clarify why we did this in case there was any confusion. I don't want anyone to think we are playing games or manipulating things, but rather this is something we had to do to ensure proper risk management during these odd market conditions. If you have any more questions about this, please let us know. Thanks.

Now, let take a look at the market...

As we talked about this week, I see continued aversion to risk happening in the market, which I believe is a big contributing factor in why the euro is under the gun against the dollar... so, lets break this down:

Equities -- overnight the Nikkei closed down over 600 points, signaling continued fear of risk in Asia. Today, the Dow closed down 65 points, closing at 12,200 on the dot. Now I'm hardly an expert on the Dow, but I have to believe that a break below the 12,000 level would put renewed selling pressure on the Dow and Dow futures. For the euro, these declines in the equity markets will only get it pressured against the dollar, and will keep the EUR/USD at the bottom of the range.

Recession -- After yesterday's abysmal ISM services data, once again the markets were talking recesion... not just the U.S. recession, but a global recession. These recession fears are real, not unfounded. Fundamentals point to true recession happening. The problem with this recession issue as it relates to the euro and the dollar is where things get a little weird and tricky.

I'm still firmly believing that a full-blown U.S. recession will negatively impact growth in Europe and will negatively impact the value of the euro and will negatively impact demand for the euro. Logic would tell you that a U.S. recession should keep the dollar under the gun and keep it weak against higher yielders like the euro, but almost by the day I'm more convinced the dollar is somehow going to come out smelling like a rose as the year rolls on.

And here's where I start thinking like a bank would think -- if the U.S. causes a global slowdown which would directly effect European growth, are the banks going to be as over-the-top bullish on the euro as they were in 2007? No way. Much of the euro's strength is built upon strong growth fundamentals, a very hawkish central bank, a central bank that so far has been very tight on monetary policy and hawkish with rates.

At the same time, the euro rose to stardom the past few years on the back of the U.S.'s weakening fundamentals and the fore-knowlege from the banks that the Fed would eventually have to slash rates. In addition, the EUR/USD was bolstered by rising gold, rising oil, lower bond yields, and skyrocketing equities markets.

But in today's market landscape, we need to paint a different picture... many of those factors that have compelled the banks to keep buying the euro and to keep pushing it higher against the dollar are turning the other direction...

We've said it a million times, but growth in Europe is slowing and will keep slowing -- the European fundamentals will be weak this year overall. The ECB while remaining hawkish on price stability, will have to cut rates later this year because Trichet eventually will have to address Europe's growth issues and the only way central banks deal with slow growth is to cut rates.

If we do fall into recession, commodities should level off or decrease in value. Equities may have a tough time this year. And if the markets decide to go heavily into risk aversion mode, this usually means they flock to so-called save havens like U.S. securities, and believe it or not, the USD.

I hope you don't think we're beating a dead horse here, but I just want to explain why our concerns about the euro are mounting as the year rolls along. I want to state our case clearly... and give you some food for thought.

EUR/USD trading...

With the EUR/USD meandering in the low 4600's, this pair is in what I consider to be a very precarious spot... with the euro falling under the 4740 level, this leaves the door wide open for more downside testing... staying below that level removes much upside momentum and potential. That being said, staying above the 4550 level also leaves some room for buyers to emerge to push the pair back up towards the top of the range... so, this is why I say we're in a weird spot at the moment.

As far as trading goes, there's no clear direction to trade with any fair degree of certainty unless we can sustain a break above 4740 or sustain a break below 4550... based on current market conditions and what's happening with the global indicies, I can't really be biased one way or the other -- my personal risk management rules will not allow me to go heavy long or short at the moment... this means I'm tightening up my accounts, not trying to catch a big move, but playing the intraday, taking a few pips per trade and getting out. They key is that I do not want to get caught going the wrong way should the market decide to go nuts and make another 200+ pip move...

Playing the intraday for me has meant shorting the rises... I've felt more comfortable shorting the rises the past 48 hours, and this bias is based on what I see with price action, what I see with gold, oil, the Dow, and the 10-year... speaking of the 10-year, yields have made a strong comeback in recent days which has put even further downside pressure on the EUR/USD.

Tomorrow...

Tomorrow is the big day -- ECB interest rate policy at 0745 EST, followed by Trichet's press conference at 0830 EST. Trichet will hold rates at 4.00%. With Eurozone inflation running at 3.2%, there's really no way he can cut rates while remaining so vigilent on price stability. Of course, the market will be watching closely to what he says about the near-term future...

The past two press conferences Trichet has been somewhat dovish on growth. He's not made a single reference to possible rate cuts, in fact, he's said a rate cut option was not on the table.

Now there's no way I can predict what the man will say tomorrow, but I'm warning you now, if he ups the rhetoric on Europe's slowing growth, and if he says Eurozone inflation will subside later this year, the euro will stay under pressure. In addition, if he says all of those things and even slightly hints at possible ECB rate cuts happening this year, I fully expect the market to hammer the euro.

I will be tightening things up as we draw close to the rate decision and following press conference. As Yeno says, expect the unexpected...

I don't believe we'll see any mega moves before tomorrow morning as the market should fall into a wait-and-see mode. Should we dip below the 4600 level, some buyers may emerge to push the euro back up, so keep that in mind over the next 12 hours or so...

You'd be well served watching Trichet's press conference tomorrow. You can view it here.

-FX Insights

Ron Paul on the coming Economic Collapse

Click here to watch the full interview 38.35min

What if House Prices Fall by 30% Worldwide?

by Gary North

In the midst of local house-buying manias, the classic mark of the end is when buyers line up to buy a house and bid against each other. This is the best way to sell a house and the worst way to buy one.

Why do buyers do this? Because they have missed out again and again by offering less than the listed price. The buyers who offered the listed price bought the house.

[I did this in February, 2005 for my home. The other family thought that $90,000 for a 4-bedroom house was too much to pay. They were wrong.]

Then the panic escalates. Those offering the listed price get left behind. They wait too long. "Too long" means more than one day after the house comes on the market. They hesitate. He who hesitates is lost in a seller's market.

Read the rest

Who’s Been Goosing Goldilocks?

The Myth Of Free Markets

"The power of myth is extraordinary. Correctly applied, the ignorant will believe themselves enlightened and slaves will believe themselves free."

When credit markets began to unravel in the summer of 2007, central bankers and economists were surprised. In retrospect, they should not have been. Warnings of a speculative bubble were issued as soon as cheap credit began distorting housing prices in 2003. Denial, however, always trumps reason in the presence of profits—or ulterior motive in the case of Greenspan.

So it was in the 1920s in the US, in the 1980s in Japan, in the 1990s in the US and it will be so again in the 2000s in the US—all large speculative bubbles ending in collapse; but this time, like in the 1930s, the collapse will affect the entire world, for another global depression may be in the offing.

Credit, like steroids, is a potent tool and is now the prime mover of financial markets in New York, London, Tokyo, Hong Kong, etc. The interest rate of central banks measures the flow of liquidity in the form of credit that credit-addicted global markets depend on and crave; but credit like steroids, with continued usage will destroy the body it once helped—Parcus nex, sic economic death, is the next stage in our deadly dance with debt.

Read the Rest